• Latest
  • Trending
Supreme Court

SC acquits woman who was minor at the time of crime

January 28, 2024
heart attack

Study shows kidney drug can boost treatment for heart attack patients

September 2, 2024
Swaminathan

RBI’s stringent actions intended to protect customers: Swaminathan

September 2, 2024
Dhanush, Shourya and Vania

Dhanush, Shourya and Vania trio break world record in Air Rifle at Deaf World Championships

September 2, 2024
Indian equity indices opened flat on August 29 due to negative cues from Asian and US markets

Sensex closes above 82,500 points for first time ever

September 2, 2024
coal

India’s coal production sees 6.48 pc growth at 384 MT in April-August

September 2, 2024
railways

Cabinet nod to Rs 18,036 cr project to connect Mumbai, Indore via shortest rail route

September 2, 2024
telecom manufacturing

Aim to democratise telecom services under Digital Bharat Nidhi initiative

September 2, 2024
ace ev

Indian commercial vehicle industry reverses decline, to see modest growth in FY25

September 2, 2024
India’s manufacturing growth

India’s manufacturing growth eases in August, stays above long-run average

September 2, 2024
Supreme Court

SC dismisses PIL seeking caste-based census

September 2, 2024

Indian Navy’s P-8I lands in France, marking its first ever deployment in Europe

September 2, 2024
PM Modi congratulates Nishad Kumar

PM Modi congratulates Nishad Kumar on winning silver medal in Paralympics

September 2, 2024
Blitz India UK Edition
Contact
Download
  • Home
  • Booming Britain
  • G20 Podium
  • Legal
  • Specials
  • National
    • East
    • West
    • South
    • North
  • News
  • Education
  • Videos
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Welcome To Blitz India Media
No Result
View All Result

SC acquits woman who was minor at the time of crime

by Blitzindiamedia
January 28, 2024
in News
0
Supreme Court
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Team Blitz India

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court acquitted a woman accused in a murder case from 2000 after learning that she was below 18 years of age at the time of the incident. The Supreme Court bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan noted that on the date of the incident, the woman appellant, identified as Pramila, was a juvenile aged 17. The bench said that the woman should have been dealt with under Section 21 of the Juvenile Justice Act.

“Under clause (h) of Section 2 of the 1986 JJ Act, a ‘juvenile’ has been defined to mean a boy who has not attained the age of sixteen years or a girl who has not attained the age of eighteen years. Thus, on the date of occurrence of the offence, the appellant was a juvenile. “Therefore, the appellant ought to have been dealt with in accordance with Section 21 of the 1986 JJ Act. The maximum action which could have been taken against the appellant was of sending her to a special home,” the apex court said.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Study shows kidney drug can boost treatment for heart attack patients

RBI’s stringent actions intended to protect customers: Swaminathan

Tags: Juvenile Justice ActminorSC

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Blitzindiamedia News Subscription

Search

No Result
View All Result
Welcome To Blitz India Media

© 2023 Blitz India Media -Blitz India Building A New Nation

Navigate Site

  • Booming Britain
  • G20 Podium
  • New India
  • Legal
  • Contact

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • The Blitz
  • G20 Podium
  • National
    • East
    • West
    • South
    • North
  • Focus
  • Opinion
  • Booming Britain
  • Perspective
  • Legal
  • Specials
  • Download

© 2023 Blitz India Media -Blitz India Building A New Nation